“One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman”
- Simone de Beauvoir
Simone de Beauvoir's words come to mind when viewing The Day I Became a Woman. Their philosophies are inherently linked, and while de Beauvoir's words can mean different things to different women, especially in regards to trans women, I think the root of it's radicalism is in how it analyzes socialization in a world driven by patriarchy. Meshkini's film The Day I Became a Woman is also about expectations brought upon women by simply being, and it lies in the intersection of women living in the middle east, which is a narrative that isn't as common in wider feminist film discussion.
The film is broken up into three vignettes, following three different women, and chronicling all three at varying ages. It's within this linear storytelling that you get a sense for how women in the middle east have to navigate the seas of patriarchy through different stages of life, and it begins from the onset of birth, because simply being a girl you're expected to live life in a very specific way. The beauty of this film is that these girls and women have to live within these expectations, but they strive and fight for what they want. What's even greater about this is that Meshkini never loses grasp of the complexities of Iranian Women's lives in her realist lens. It's her narratives of how these women negotiate agency through oppression that truly make the film's feminist intentions important, because the film never forgoes their struggles for an easier happy ending, but it does show how they live through these difficulties.
The first vignette is about a young girl named Hava. She spends most of her days playing with a local boy her same age, eating ice cream, and digging through sand on the seaside, but upon her ninth birthday she must give all of this up. Her mother and grandmother profess that she is a woman and she must put those things aside. She must cover herself and stop interacting with boys, because she's too old for these things now. Hava understands the complicated situation she is about to enter into, but she uses the last hour before her birthday to do what she always does. This segment of the picture is minimalist realism as it's subdued tone, nature and imagery are showing just how regular Hava's life is at this point. The moment she shares a final piece of candy with her best friend while they make goofy faces at each other is especially joyful. Both of them carry a childlike innocence, and for Hava that's about to end simply because she is a girl. The image of Hava being framed around what look like prison bars is the only moment where this vignette goes beyond it's subtleties into something more blatantly political, and it's one of the stronger images in the film. The stories final moments of her ditching her chador so other boys can build a sail for their homemade ship is perhaps an allegory for her rejecting the kind of role she's expected to engage in, but it's all just vague enough that Hava could have simply done this because she's good natured and willing to help out her friends, and by making it vague Meshkini implies that those women who do accept the chador are not inferior.
The next woman (Ahoo) featured in this movie is in much more dire straits as she's being followed by the men in her family on horseback. She has entered into a bicycle race with other women, and her husband forbids it. He follows her (filmed in Meshkini's dazzling tracking shots) and shouts back at her that the devil has control of her. Meshkini frames Ahoo's determined face as she ignores her husband, and actress Shabnam Toloui's stoic, exhausted expressions spell a narrative of draining sexism. This bicycle race is allegorical to her running away from those constrictions of her marriage and family, and it's even more striking that this is specifically a woman's race so while she snakes in and out of competitors the image is framed by these women in chador's barreling forward towards something. Maybe freedom. Maybe just a sense of having completed the race. This story is the most accomplished of the three from a visual standpoint as Meshkini works in long shots, longer takes, aerial work, close ups and tracking shots to get as much as she can both out of this race and the movement of this multitude of cycling women. The segment ends with the men of her family running her down and taking her bicycle from her as shouting can be hard in the distance. The image moves further and further away from them and the question of whether she finished the race is left completely up in the air.
The final entry focuses on an elderly woman and her desires to finally acquire the material possessions she always wanted in her life. It is in this narrative that the film lets go of it's burdening realism and goes into the fantastical, and for this woman it's a kind of happy ending she always desired. Once she purchases all of her items (a fridge, a dresser, a bed, a television) she settles on a beach and treats the sand as home. The boys who helped carry all of her items there play with everything she purchased including makeup and dresses, and it's all very rogue in the face of middle eastern gender roles. If anything the films mission statement would see those freedoms to be of utmost priority, and the focus of happiness those lessening burdens of gendered law have on these people. The film eventually wraps around back to the first girl. Hava sees this older woman getting what she wants and as she sets off for see Hava, cloaked, stares at her. It's a beautiful moment of realization for one girl who has just become a woman in the eyes of the society she is growing up in, and the freedoms expressed by this older woman, even if they are simply material, are something she can gravitate towards.
The notion of the feminist film is often bastardized to mean anything featuring women in significant roles, and while I agree that representation matters I think for a film to be feminist it has to have the intentions of unsettling something in culture through art. The Day I Became a Woman is truly feminist in these regards. Meshkini never damns the women in her picture for the sake of saying one way of life is better than another, and her lens simply exists to give these three women's stories a place to be told. The film is expressly political in it's intentions, but more than just being about a woman's place in society it's about life as a woman. Often the film veers off from this trajectory to linger on a moment. Hava shares candy, Ahoo looks into the eyes of another competitor in the bicycle race and shares an understanding, the elderly woman talks about the twist ties on her hands. The film is fiercely political and stridently feminist, but it's also an empathetic, and marvelous look at women. That's the film's greatest achievement.
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Female FIlmmaker Project: No Fear, No Die (Claire Denis, 1990)
Denis creates a cinema of either utmost beauty or total effecting horror, and often these modes are interchangeable in her visual language. In Beau Travail the male body is a canvas, but the film becomes increasingly suffocating as characters go further and further down a rabbit hole of increasingly difficult regimens in the sculpting of those bodies. In Bastards the sensual style that she created around lingering bodies, and intimacy was turned inward into something horrifying as it dealt specifically with sexual assault. Denis is no doubt a filmmaker of bodies, but her films often explore themes around how those bodies navigate a world that isn't exactly fair to them. In No Fear, No Die she goes back to the well of established ideas in her debut Chocolat in oppression through colonialism. While Chocolat's ideas are presented in an autobiographical narrative (Denis grew up in South Africa), No Fear, No Die places the camera distinctly on the lives of those most intensely effected by a white supremacist world.
Dah (Isaach De Bankole') and Jocelyn (Alex Descas) are trying to make their way in France as cockfighters. It's a quick way to earn a buck, and they are skilled at training their birds in combat. Jocelyn struggles with this task as he shows saturating love for the birds he is sending to their deaths, and as the film goes on he has a harder time adhering to his superior's requests to up the violence of the cockfights by including weaponry not natural to a chicken. They are struggling for cash so they succumb to their bosses demands, and this seems to send Jocelyn into a depression.
What's so remarkable about Denis' work in No Fear, No Die is how effortlessly she seems to navigate through these ideas of being owned while still capturing an eerie beauty of the process of loving & raising one of these rooster's in the art of combat. Jocelyn sincerely cares about the fate of his birds, and while it's silly of him to care this much about these animals & be in this profession he gives them love and care. Denis shoots these scenes similarly with compassion. Jocelyn will hold his birds close to his chest and pet them for significant amounts of time while Denis gives us close up of his hands. These scenes are also often presented in a softer, richer light than the dingy underground of the cock fighting world. It isn't a leap to think the metaphor of the cockfighting can be seen as pitting black men against one another while white men profit from their work. The metaphor for this is backed up by how she shoots the cockfighting. It's almost as if these chickens know they are tangled metaphors. She shoots in extreme close up on their bodies, emphasizing their quick jumping movements as well as the claws they use to destroy each other (no animals were hurt in the making of this movie, but it's still extremely difficult to watch). At the end of the day these chickens are sentenced to death before they even entered this arena, and one can't help but feel Denis feels a similar empathy to those who enter life with the deck stacked against them, much like Jocelyn and Dah.
There's a sense of fatigue in this movie. Denis shoots these grimy underworlds in constricted spaces. Ceilings hang low, hallways are tight, and small rooms are filled to the brim with men smoking, drinking, and cheering on this destruction. Bankole's eyes speak volumes in the films final moments as he watches his friend stumble further into the destruction of this sickening profession. He stands with his back next to a red painted wall, it's intensely foreboding to his friends fate, and the blood on their hands for the creatures they raised to die for a quick buck. It's an incredible moment of acting and direction coinciding for a brilliant visual moment sold by an actor's face.
No Fear, No Die is a mournful picture, coloured by past history & shrouded in death. The world is broken for these men, and Denis captures this in her emotional painting. Chickens spill blood, Humans spill blood. In this film the cost is all the same. Money stands in the way of peacefulness. It always has.
Sunday, February 8, 2015
Female Filmmaker Project: Waitress (Adrienne Shelly, 2007)
Waitress came into my life a few
years ago when I became fast friends with Sara
Freeman. I discussed very lightly with her some of my favourite
movies over an email once and she brought this movie up. I was
curious to view it someday, and I finally got around to that
recently. I couldn't have fallen more head over heels in love. There
are a lot of reasons why I adore this movie, but the signature reason
is it's unbridled love for women, their struggles, the place they
carve out in the world, and the reliance and support they give one
another in times of need while still loving each other enough to
disagree. The centrality of women in this picture is more than just
refreshing, it's invigoratingly pure in what it can represent for
women in cinema.
The film is framed around
the struggles of one normal, American woman in the deep South whose
one true passion is making pies. Jenna (Keri Russell) deals with an
abusive husband and an unexpected pregnancy, and while her life seems
to be in a rut she's always reaching towards breaking free from her
bad marriage and constricting day to day existence. She dreams of
romance, as we all do, and shortly after becoming pregnant she meets
a doctor (Nathan Fillion) who she gives her something resembling
compassion and love. On paper this seems like a typical cliche
romantic comedy, but director Adrienne Shelly isn't interested in men
in this picture, and she doesn't give you the ending of a prince
charming running away and saving Jena's life. That would be far too
rote for a picture of this magnitude in the place of Women's Cinema.
Waitress is about one
woman above all else, and the choices she makes along the way to save
her own life. She's an artist first and foremost, and she has modest
dreams of opening her own pie shop. The film beautifully gives Jenna
a "happy place" of imagining the creation of pies whenever
she is dealing with her oftentimes difficult life. She's friendly
with everyone around her by making them unique pies to suit the
specific situation, and overall she just seems like a genuinely good
person. When Jenna becomes pregnant it actually gives her life the
push she needed to break way from her husband who is anything, but
loving in the way she is. He is destructive, smothering, and needy
above all else. Her friends are with her along the way as they guide
her and give her emotional support even with their own life problems.
The back and forth they have is rich, and filled with compassion
towards one another, and feels accurate to the back and forth in day
to day friendships between women.
Jenna has no connection with
the fetus inside of her, but she begins to formulate plans to get
away. In the triumphant final moments of the picture she finally
takes complete control of her life, and flatly tells her husband
she's leaving him. She's taking her daughter and going very far away,
and if he ever comes back into her life there would be consequences.
Fuck yeah. Importantly though, Jenna also doesn't want anything else
to do with the man she had been sleeping with during the pregnancy as
both of these men are blurred out in one of the best images in the
film with a clear focus on Jenna and her newborn daughter Lulu. She
eventually rides out of the hospital with her two best girlfriends
beside her, and her newborn daughter.
The epilogue is what cements
the movie as a personal favourite though, as it showed the type of
love she had for her piemaking with her daughter. When Jenna
discussed her childhood earlier in the film she talked about making
pies with her mother, and remarked on it being the happiest times of
her life. She wanted to do the same for her daughter, and there's a
wonderful callback that shows Lulu and Jenna creating pies in her
kitchen in the new restaurant she opened. Which she lovlingly dubbed
"Lulu's Pies". Jenna did it, she carved out a place for the
life she wanted. It's meager, and modest, but it's hers. She's an
artist with a venue, she has all the people in her life she needed,
and all the love in her life was filled up by a daughter. It's a feel
good ending for sure, but it feels completely earned, because of
Jenna's struggles. Good things should happen to good people.
Waitress more than
anything else represents the kind of optimism that should be able to
be found in Cinema. It's pleasant cinema, but it completely
accomplishes it's goals of creating investment around Jenna's journey
to self realization by showing just how hard she fought to get where
she is at today. It also subverts a few of the romantic comedy
trappings that befall the genre by having her choose herself in what
feels closer to a Broadcast News kind of ending rather than
your run of the mill love triangle narrative. There needs to be more
movies like this, and there needs to be more of a place in cinema for
women to hone their craft, because the world needs more films like
Waitress. Cinema needs films with this much humanity. We need
an Adrienne Shelly.
I'd like to take a moment
now to bring up the Adrienne
Shelly foundation. Before this movie was released in cinema
Shelly was tragically murdered, and cinema lost a vibrant, important
young voice. That tragedy will never be erased, but you can honour
her memory by donating or supporting the foundation that was created
in the aftermath of that senseless crime. The foundation's goal of
supporting Women in film is one that I greatly agree with, as this
blogs entire goal this year is to bring to light films directed by
women. So please check out the Adrienne Shelly Foundation, her
movies, and more films directed by women.
Sunday, February 1, 2015
January 2015 in Cinema
![]() |
| The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants |
Best of January
1. Come Back to the Five and Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean (Robert Altman, 1982)
2. Whisper of the Heart (Yoshifumi Kondo, 1995)
3. Blackhat (Michael Mann, 2015)
4. Hookers on Davie (Holly Dale, Janis Cole, 1984)
5. Barton Fink (Coens, 1991)
6. Romance (Catherine Breillat, 1999)
7. The Gold Diggers (Sally Potter, 1983)
8. Mommy (Xavier Dolan, 2014)
9. The Floorwalker (Charlie Chaplin, 1916)
10. Begging Naked (Karen Gehres, 2007)
Favourite rewatches
Broadcast News (James L. Brooks, 1987)
Fat Girl (Catherine Breillat, 2001)
Miami Vice (Michael Mann, 2006)
Collateral (Michael Mann, 2004)
Darkman (Sam Raimi, 1990)
Blade Runner (Ridley Scott, 1982)
City Lights (Charlie Chaplin, 1931)
Tally: (Before I started this year I wanted to keep all my new to me viewings balanced on a gender spectrum. I do realize it's ridiculous to note gender as a binary, but I currently do not know any non-binary filmmakers. Drop a line in the comments to alert me of some if you know of any. Thank you. I'll be keeping this tally as I watch movies this year. Rewatches do not count towards this number.)
Women: 9
Men: 12
So you can see I'm already failing. However, Women already have the lead 1-0 this month. Let's hope they can pull back to the front in February.
![]() |
| Romance |
Sunday, January 25, 2015
Female Filmmaker Project: Ratcatcher (Lynne Ramsay, 1999)
The film begins with the death of a 12 year old boy in an accidental drowning due to play fighting. Ramsay uses close up shots of his hands, and the reaction of a mother who fears it is her own child through a window to convey this loss, but even more than the blunt imagery of a pale ghostly hand she created a world of rigor mortis in Glasgow. The air seems thick with poison, and the world is depleted of it's colour. Rats infest the streets as garbage workers are on strike and the unwanted items of houses get tossed out to fill up the streets. And it is a world of seemingly endless sorrow with it's lack of anything resembling vibrancy. Glasgow is in a transitional place in this picture with many occupants being moved around slowly into better housing, and garbage men are fighting for more significant rights to better their own lives. It mirrors James' growing up from boy to teenager. Everything should be progressing for James and Glasgow, but Ramsay-to the film's strength- is more interested in the current harsh conditions of the area and the guilt of having been involved in his friends death than a feel good narrative of improvement.
James isn't the only character struggling to make it in Glasgow. He befriends a girl (Margaret Anne) early in the picture who does sexual favours on the side, but is mercilessly mocked for this reason, her weight, and her need to wear glasses. In their relationship the film finds some of it's few happier moments. James and Margaret Anne share many significant scenes and seem to have an instant bond. She finds him more trustworthy than the boys he sometimes runs around with (as he treats her with common respect), and he doesn't have to put up his guard and act hypermasculine to impress her. He even attempts to retrieve her glasses from a pond at one point despite his post traumatic fear of water. He has a similar relationship with his sister, and while they fight as siblings do they shelter each other from the harshness of their sometimes violent father. The humanity and character interaction of James with the various women in his life are often the films sweetest moments. The presence of the gang of boys his age who are more interested in violence, teasing and making it with girls seems foreign to him after the events of the drowning earlier in the picture. His greatest betrayal growing up is even when one of his few male friends, who had a fondness for animals, begins to exhibit violent behaviour to those creates he once loved ,and James finds his friendship with him crumbling. In these ways Ratcatcher exhibits traditional ideas of masculinity as being toxic to male development, and it backs this up with the abusive relationship he has with his father whose only interest for James is to become interested in sports despite his hatred of Football.
James does find solace though, and Ramsay gives him these happier moments by taking him to a safe zone. It would be his future housing, and doubly a look at the future Glasgow has in mind for it's poorer residents. In these moments James explores, he loses himself in a field, and the shooting style changes from one of decay to life. The sun seems to arrive for the first time in the picture, and colour finally fills up the frame with deeper blues and rose-y golden fields. He's like a kid here, not worrying about the future problems he'd find in adolescence and adulthood. He seems to have a way out in this luxurious house (at least compared to his old one), but the films final scenes are worrying. In a moment of inevitability he plunges himself in water and he begins to suffer the same fate as his friend. If this is to be read as metaphor then there was no way out of growing up for James, and his housing situation wouldn't take away the grief that came from his maturing, and for Glasgow improving housing would only be a temporary fix to a rat's paradise.
Wednesday, January 14, 2015
Female Filmmaker Project: Begging Naked (Karen Gehres, 2007)
***note:This film was not part of the scheduled 52 movies for this project, but after viewing it I decided to review it for this project***
More than anything I
think this film cements the importance of sex work as a viable job
for some women. Legislators and lawmakers that are so protective
towards these women do more harm than good, by cutting off their
source of income as they find their way onto the streets without a
job. That is the case for Begging Naked's Elise Hill whose life
begins to unravel after Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani wiped out the sex
shops and prostitution that used to make up the culture of 42nd
Street in favour of the now disneyfication of the area. Elise Hill's
life wasn't pretty when she was stripping for a living, but it was
still a life worth living, and in putting her out on the streets she
was cut off from a world she had much to give to.
Elise Hill was a
runaway at age 15. Her household was physically abusive, and she ran
off to New York to be an artist. She wanted more than anything to go
to art school, and found her way into sex work once she arrived. She
struggled for a very long time, and started using heroin to cope with
her life, but she came to a realization during those difficult years,
kicked those drugs and put her way through art school by selling
paintings on the side. When the film begins it's seven year journey
she goes back to stripping at the age of 30 to support herself, but
continued to paint. She was an artist first and foremost and took
great pride in the work she was creating, which at this time was
portraits of the slimy men and beautiful women of these clubs. She
had great compassion for her friends she was painting, and in 1997
seemed to have her life put together even if she was living a very
small life. Regardless it was a happy one. Then the streets she grew
up on were painted in a different kind of capitalism and she lost
everything.
This eventual spiral is
what makes up the majority of Begging Naked's narrative as the camera
mostly just follows Elise around from place to place as she attempts
to sell her art, as her life begins to come apart at the seems. It's
a difficult narrative to take in, because all of this was
preventable, but in trying to clean up the streets of New York City,
Giuliani only crowded them with good people.
Elise was one of those
good people, and it's downright tragic to see her lose control of her
mind towards the end of the picture. She struggles with feelings of
paranoia mostly, and begins to think that the CIA are listening in on
her, but she finds a kind of solace in that belief as she begins to
jot down everything in a journal. She thinks they are listening and
one day what she's writing will be available for everyone to read,
because they will post it on the internet. In a way this film is that
journal, and director Karen Gehres gave her that wish.
The most striking
aspect of this film is it's depiction of homelessness not as
something that happens to specific people, but a thing that can
happen to anyone. Gehres' humanity towards her friend comes through
as she doesn't paint Elise as a tragic figure, but one of
perseverance. We see the moment she gets kicked out of her apartment,
but it doesn't end with a cut to black and then her on the streets.
We see Elise fight for her possessions that she holds dear and the
cat that's been living with her, whom she loves. She takes her
paintings as well, because this is her lifeblood and later on even
when she is on the streets she is creating art. It's good art too, as
her paintings symbolize a confidence in portrait as she painted a
type of person who isn't shown as beautiful very often: the women of
the capitalist sexual world who are doing jobs just to get by. She
has a kinship with those women, because she is one of them, and
Gehres respects that. The movie states that her art today resides in
a stocking room warehouse collecting dust, and Elise is still living
in Central Park.
Monday, January 12, 2015
Female Filmmaker Project: Romance (Catherine Breillat, 1999)
Catherine Breillat's career has been a treatise on sexuality and womanhood, even her films that aren't explicity sexual like Sleeping Beauty or Abuse of Weakness are informed by things like menstruation and sub/domme flourishes. Romance falls easily in line with pictures of her past like A Real Young Girl as it is very overtly about a woman's sexuality and how it connects itself with her feelings of love from her celibate (unless for child rearing) boyfriend whom she loves dearly, but becomes increasingly frustrated with as time passes. Her relationship with him leads her into many trysts with her other men that finally ends with her on the other end of sexual punishment with a man whose ideas of sexuality and of women are incredibly toxic, but she finds the brutality in him that is missing in her otherwise flaccid boyfriend.
Breillat's thesis on sexuality is handled mostly through voice over as it plays out over scenes of sex. Marie discusses her ideas on men and what she wants out of a relationship with them in terms of carnality and by placing us inside of her head for the entire film as well as navigating alongside her with the camera. There are many close up shots of her body during scenes of foreplay, masturbation, and sex. All these things make it feel more like a first person unraveling of one woman's sexuality than it does a statement on women as a whole. Which is promising, because sexuality is an extremely tricky business, and Breillat's raw, unflinching look at pleasure wouldn't be pleasurable to some, but with Marie sex is more forceful, erect, strong and violent than consensual or even symbiotic. One wonders if sex is even about pleasure with her as the word "Orgasm" is not mentioned one time throughout the duration of this film. Marie likens herself as a hollow, disposable form when discussing the idea of perfect sex, and the more inward and disassociated with her body she becomes the better she feels. These ideas are never more present than in the visual language of a dream sequence late in the picture with Marie's body being split in half. In two rooms her body is divided, the lower half of herself is spread open, in lingerie in a smoke filled room with naked, lustful men, and the walls are covered in red. The upper part of her body is located in a headache inducing room of whiteness as her celibate boyfriend sits beside her. The disassociation of brain and body, sex and love are ideas at play in this movie and in that one moment they became distinctly clear in her language. The scene closes with a humorous match cut of a man ejaculating on Marie's stomach followed by her pregnant belly being covered in gel for an ultrasound.This, as well, is the difference between sex in terms of pleasure (the orgy) versus love (the child).
Marie's sexuality is at it's most dangerous when she comes into contact with an older teacher at the school she works in and begins engaging in violent S&M. She finds herself drawn towards this man who believes all women secretly want rape; that asking for sex is never appropriate, but taking is what women especially want. Breillat was never exactly easygoing about her film's sexual nature, but in his monologues the film becomes increasingly difficult to view. He introduces her to being tied up; something she always wanted to do, and gagging her during sex. He enjoys inducing pain in his partners and she finds herself drawn to it. The rooms she has sex in during these moments are closer to that red colour of the orgy in the dream sequence, and are in direct contrast with the stark whites of her boyfriends apartment. She unlocks her sexuality with this dangerous man who has claimed to have slept with over 10,000 women and eventually leaves her boyfriend to be with him.
Despite all of the views of the man I mentioned above, and her decision to be with him I find the film's feminism to be enticingly rich. It's strongest feminist text is by simply being about one woman's sexuality from her viewpoint and her's alone. She doesn't make any apologies about what she wants, and what she likes, and she goes after it. She loves her boyfriend dearly, but she'll cheat on him to get the sex that she needs to find fulfillment. She's not a nymphomaniac. She's just a woman, and in killing her boyfriend in the films final moments Breillat's ideas come full circle that you cannot have love without sex even if they are disparate ideas for Marie. She chose sex. She chose herself.
Breillat's thesis on sexuality is handled mostly through voice over as it plays out over scenes of sex. Marie discusses her ideas on men and what she wants out of a relationship with them in terms of carnality and by placing us inside of her head for the entire film as well as navigating alongside her with the camera. There are many close up shots of her body during scenes of foreplay, masturbation, and sex. All these things make it feel more like a first person unraveling of one woman's sexuality than it does a statement on women as a whole. Which is promising, because sexuality is an extremely tricky business, and Breillat's raw, unflinching look at pleasure wouldn't be pleasurable to some, but with Marie sex is more forceful, erect, strong and violent than consensual or even symbiotic. One wonders if sex is even about pleasure with her as the word "Orgasm" is not mentioned one time throughout the duration of this film. Marie likens herself as a hollow, disposable form when discussing the idea of perfect sex, and the more inward and disassociated with her body she becomes the better she feels. These ideas are never more present than in the visual language of a dream sequence late in the picture with Marie's body being split in half. In two rooms her body is divided, the lower half of herself is spread open, in lingerie in a smoke filled room with naked, lustful men, and the walls are covered in red. The upper part of her body is located in a headache inducing room of whiteness as her celibate boyfriend sits beside her. The disassociation of brain and body, sex and love are ideas at play in this movie and in that one moment they became distinctly clear in her language. The scene closes with a humorous match cut of a man ejaculating on Marie's stomach followed by her pregnant belly being covered in gel for an ultrasound.This, as well, is the difference between sex in terms of pleasure (the orgy) versus love (the child).
Marie's sexuality is at it's most dangerous when she comes into contact with an older teacher at the school she works in and begins engaging in violent S&M. She finds herself drawn towards this man who believes all women secretly want rape; that asking for sex is never appropriate, but taking is what women especially want. Breillat was never exactly easygoing about her film's sexual nature, but in his monologues the film becomes increasingly difficult to view. He introduces her to being tied up; something she always wanted to do, and gagging her during sex. He enjoys inducing pain in his partners and she finds herself drawn to it. The rooms she has sex in during these moments are closer to that red colour of the orgy in the dream sequence, and are in direct contrast with the stark whites of her boyfriends apartment. She unlocks her sexuality with this dangerous man who has claimed to have slept with over 10,000 women and eventually leaves her boyfriend to be with him.
Despite all of the views of the man I mentioned above, and her decision to be with him I find the film's feminism to be enticingly rich. It's strongest feminist text is by simply being about one woman's sexuality from her viewpoint and her's alone. She doesn't make any apologies about what she wants, and what she likes, and she goes after it. She loves her boyfriend dearly, but she'll cheat on him to get the sex that she needs to find fulfillment. She's not a nymphomaniac. She's just a woman, and in killing her boyfriend in the films final moments Breillat's ideas come full circle that you cannot have love without sex even if they are disparate ideas for Marie. She chose sex. She chose herself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










































